Skip to main content

Americans will bet $4.8B on Super Bowl, most of it illegally

By Jeff Clabaugh

WASHINGTON — Americans will wager $4.76 billion on the 2018 Super Bowl between the New England Patriots and Philadelphia Eagles, according to the D.C.-based American Gaming Association. And 97 percent of all wagers will be bet illegally, according to the group.

Only three percent, or about $139 million, of Super Bowl bets are expected to be legally wagered through licensed sports books in Nevada, the only state exempted from the federal ban on full-scale sports betting.

The rest will flow through offshore sports booking sites, local bookmakers and office pools, which, though popular in offices across the country, are technically illegal.

What is and isn’t illegal could change soon, however.

In December, the Supreme Court heard arguments in “Christie v. NCAA,” a challenge from former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie to legalize sports betting in New Jersey.

And earlier this month, the National Basketball Association gave its support to the elimination of the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992.

“The big question we’re asking is 2018 finally the year when governments, sporting bodies and the gaming industry work together to put the illegal sports betting market out of business,” said American Gaming Association president and CEO Geoff Freeman in a statement.

If the association is right, Super Bowl betting this year will be up slightly from last year.

It estimated last year’s New England Patriots versus Atlanta Falcons matchup generated $4.7 billion in wagering, according to Bloomberg News.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

By The Associated Press
BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story

Related News

Is the US headed for a Black recession? Report details warning signs

Zillow’s chief economist says DC-area home market is now affordable