Skip to main content

Zillow’s chief economist says DC-area home market is now affordable

Homes are becoming easier to buy in the nation’s capital, a leading economist says, especially when compared to 20 years ago.

“The change that stands out the most to me is that D.C. is a market where housing has gotten more affordable,” Zillow’s chief economist, Mischa Fisher, said.

“Right now, if you look in the D.C. metro, we have home values having come down ever so slightly year-over-year, about 0.4%. And that combination of slightly lower home values, plus slightly higher incomes, is really helping the affordability situation,” he said.

Fisher said the D.C. market is also benefiting from some major factors.

“D.C. has a very educated workforce, and it’s home to several of the top income ZIP codes in the country,” Fisher said. “That combination of high education and high-paying jobs has helped make housing more affordable.”

He said the greater Washington region has also managed to accommodate the demand for new homes.

“I think most people who drive around or take the train see those pockets where we built new housing supply, whether that’s new single-family homes, new townhomes or new higher rise multifamily homes — and all of those things have also helped keep a lid on some of the growth in costs,” Fisher said.

Fisher said Richmond, Buffalo and Hartford are hot markets right now, but he called Washington “balanced.”

“I would not characterize it as a market that’s going to be completely back to normal,” he said. “And it’s not on our list of hot markets where we expect major supply demand imbalances.”

“I would characterize it as 65 and sunny,” he added.

Our business reporter John Wordock wants to hear from you about housing affordability in the DMV. Are you seeing improvement? Are things getting better? Or not? Send your stories to John.Wordock@WTOP.com.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story