Skip to main content

Senate bill would strip president’s power to federalize DC police

New Senate legislation, proposed in the wake of widespread protests across the region, would take away the president’s authority to federalize D.C. police and control the District’s National Guard.

The legislation is co-sponsored by Sen. Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat who is sharply critical of the way President Donald Trump and his administration handled the protests near the White House earlier this month.

Van Hollen said the way the National Guard was deployed against peaceful protesters was “abhorrent” to him.

“No governor would allow the president to march troops into their state without express approval, and yet the District of Columbia is denied that basic right,” Van Hollen said in a statement. “It’s clear from Trump’s recent actions that the president must be immediately stripped of this authority.”

Van Hollen and Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., have proposed legislation that would name the mayor of D.C. commander-in-chief of the District’s National Guard, giving the mayor the same control as that of governors. It would repeal part of the Home Rule Act, which currently allows for the president to control orders for the D.C. National Guard.

A second proposal would also repeal a provision that gives the president authority to federalize the District’s police department.

Mayor Muriel Bowser said the White House inquired about federalizing D.C. police during recent protests.

She supports efforts to give the mayor’s office more autonomy over police and the D.C. National Guard, noting that it’s an important power to recognize as the District presses for statehood.

D.C. Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton has previously proposed similar legislation.

This is the first time such a bill has been proposed in the Senate.

Trump has defended his handling of the D.C. protests, arguing that a large law enforcement and military force helped prevent additional looting and property damage.

Analysis: The world Washington built is fraying. What comes next?

The United States is confronting a global security environment that increasingly resembles the outcome its Cold War adversaries once hoped to produce: a divided West, weakened alliances, economic exhaustion, multiple simultaneous wars and declining confidence in American leadership. That does not mean today’s crises were orchestrated according to some surviving Soviet master plan. The Soviet Union is gone, and the threats facing Washington now come from several different states with different interests. But the strategic effect is strikingly familiar. Early NATO assessments of Soviet intentions warned that Moscow sought to weaken the democratic powers, deny the West a secure European base and ultimately exhaust North America economically. Now, NATO says Russia is again trying to reconfigure the Euro-Atlantic security order through military force, sabotage, cyberattacks, coercion and disinformation. The difference is that much of the pressure now confronting the West is occurring simultaneously — and some of the damage to alliance cohesion is self-inflicted.
Read Next Story