Skip to main content

Why tickets for sports events are left out of DC bill combating price gouging

Buying tickets on resale marketplaces, such as Ticketmaster or StubHub, may be cheaper for shows in D.C. in the near future. The D.C. Council has given final approval to legislation that attempts to root out price gouging.

Ward 6 council member Charles Allen, who introduced the legislation, said it does a few things.

“It prohibits, first off, bots from coming in and being able to scoop up these tickets, and so that’s a big part of it. It kind of levels the playing field.”

Allen introduced the Restricting Egregious Scalping Against Live Entertainment Act, or the RESALE Act.

Allen said the measure also caps most live entertainment resales at 10% above face value, but he said that doesn’t include tickets for sporting events.

“Because we see sports tickets that really are a season ticket package type of scenario, versus, there’s an artist coming to town that you really want to go see at the 9:30 Club,” Allen said. “They’re just very different things and so this legislation was not trying to tackle sports but really your concerts, your artists and those venues.”

He said it’s possible the council will revisit the issue of sports tickets.

“Could we at some point in the future look at sporting events? I guess we could, but that just wasn’t really where we were hearing the major problem. I think more people are familiar with what happens at a Taylor Swift concert or Beyoncé or something like that, it really just gouges the fans.”

The bill’s supporters included I.M.P., which operates the 9:30 Club, The Anthem, Lincoln Theatre and The Atlantis.

Allen said because ticket price gouging is not just an issue in D.C., this legislation could become a national model.

“It’s also something that you see similar legislation that’s been introduced by Democrats, by Republicans in purple states, red states, blue states — this is an issue that resonates with a lot of people.”

Mayor Muriel Bowser voiced some concerns about the act, but it does not appear she will veto it. The act takes effect in 2027.

Get breaking news and daily headlines delivered to your email inbox by signing up here.

© 2026 WTOP. All Rights Reserved. This website is not intended for users located within the European Economic Area.

Appeals court rules Trump can’t build White House ballroom without congressional approval

WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided federal appeals court ruled Friday that President Donald Trump’s administration must stop construction of the $400 million White House ballroom because Congress has not approved the project, a decision he blasted as “unjust” while vowing to appeal it to the nation's highest court. Trump doesn’t have the unilateral authority to build a 90,000-square-foot (8,400-square-meter) ballroom where the White House’s East Wing stood before he ordered its demolition last fall, according to the decision by a three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The Republican president said on social media that the administration will immediately appeal what he called an “unjust decision” to the U.S. Supreme Court. Friday's ruling marked the second time this week that the Trump administration has made headlines for construction plans that have been called into question. An assessment by the National Park Service found that a 250-foot-tall (76-meter-tall) triumphal arch that Trump has proposed building could compromise the historical significance of dozens of sites near its planned location on a traffic circle between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington National Cemetery.
Read Next Story