Skip to main content

California and a voting rights group filed legal challenges to stop GOP sheriff’s ballot seizure

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California’s Democratic attorney general and a voting rights group launched legal challenges this week to halt a seizure and recount of more than half a million 2025 election ballots by a Republican county sheriff who is running for governor.

The dispute over the ballot seizure in Riverside County, which began last month, escalated this week as Democratic Attorney General Rob Bonta urged the court to step in and Sheriff Chad Bianco doubled down by taking more ballots from a county election office. A Riverside County judge held a hearing Friday on Bonta’s request for the case to move quickly.

His office said in a Thursday filing that Bianco seized another 426 boxes of election materials this week. Bianco said his probe was legal and approved by a Riverside County judge.

“We are conducting a lawful investigation, approved by a judge,” he said in a statement. “I think the failed democratic candidates are just trying to rally a base for their own political benefit.”

Separately, the UCLA Voting Rights Project argued in a state Supreme Court filing Thursday that the seizure violated state laws on election materials.

Bianco, one of two prominent Republican gubernatorial candidates, earlier this month said his office had launched the investigation after receiving a complaint from a local citizens group about the ballot count from a November 2025 special election on redistricting. He called the effort “a fact-finding mission,” seizing some 650,000 ballots in Riverside County, the inland California county of 2.5 million people where he has twice been elected sheriff. Local election officials told the county Board of Supervisors last month the complaint was unfounded.

Bianco said last week that his office would physically count the ballots and compare the result with the total votes reported to the state. The counting is being done by sheriff’s officials under the supervision of a special master appointed by a court. He did not give a timeline on when the counting would conclude.

Bonta’s first effort this week to stop the count failed after an appeals court said his petition was filed in the wrong place. He’s now refiled it in a lower court.

“Absent swift action by this Court, the Sheriff’s misguided investigation threatens to sow distrust and jeopardize public confidence in the upcoming primary and general elections, not just in Riverside County but around the State,” the petition reads. “It also sets a dangerous precedent that could invite future attempts to improperly contest election results through a misuse of law enforcement authority and the criminal process.”

The sheriff, a supporter of President Donald Trump, said he obtained warrants signed by a judge to seize the ballots. Bianco said the alleged discrepancy amounted to about 45,800 votes — a difference elections officials have refuted at county meetings, saying the machine count and the final count submitted to the state differed by about 100 votes. They argue the handwritten rolls, which were not relied on to check the count, were being kept by temporary elections workers who had worked long days and may have made mistakes.

The UCLA Voting Rights Project argued the sheriff has no authority to seize the ballots in a petition filed on behalf of several Riverside County voters. It’s asking the state Supreme Court to order Bianco to return the ballots.

“Law enforcement officials are legally prohibited from interfering in counting ballots, in California and nationwide,” former state attorney general Xavier Becerra, a Democrat who is running for governor and serves as a senior advisor of the group, said in a statement. “A candidate for Governor should know the law and lead by example, not weaponize his law enforcement office for political gain.”

The ballot probe came as President Trump has repeatedly disputed the results of the 2020 election, citing unsubstantiated instances of fraud. His administration recently seized ballots and other documents from an election office in Georgia. Some Republicans have mirrored Trump’s rhetoric on voting in their states.

Between prices and a diarrhea-causing parasite, lettuce is causing hard times at some restaurants

It’s been a choppy year for restaurants that lean into lettuce. Lettuce prices rose sharply in the first half of 2026 due to hot weather in Arizona, where about one-third of America’s lettuce is grown. Now, restaurants are dealing with the fallout from a cyclospora outbreak linked to shredded lettuce that has sickened thousands of Americans. Taco Bell will likely see the biggest sales impact from the outbreak, which began in late June. Federal health officials first tied the outbreak to shredded iceberg lettuce served at Taco Bell restaurants in Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and West Virginia. Later, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said customers in Illinois, Kansas, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania were also affected. Taco Bell said on July 17 that it had voluntarily removed shredded iceberg lettuce supplied by Taylor Farms from its U.S. restaurants. But its customer volume has suffered. As of July 23, Taco Bell visits were 21% lower than average across the U.S., according to Placer.ai, a market research company.
Read Next Story