Skip to main content

Cold weather is nothing new. The way the National Weather Service will describe it is

In the midst of gorgeous fall weather, it can be hard to remember that winter isn’t far behind. Now, the National Weather Service wants to simplify its messaging about potentially deadly frigid wind chills and subfreezing temperatures.

“Cold weather can be deadly — people exposed to extreme cold weather are susceptible to frostbite and can succumb to hypothermia in minutes,” according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service, in announcing its new descriptions.

Wind child warnings and watches have been renamed extreme cold warnings and watches. The wind chill advisory will now be called a cold weather advisory.

What used to be called hard freeze watches and warnings will now be called freeze watches and warnings.

“These changes seek to clarify that cold can be dangerous with or without wind, addressing a common misconception that extreme cold is only tied to colder temperatures when there is wind,” according to the National Weather Service. “Dangerously cold weather can accompany or follow wintry precipitation, and the cold messaging can be overshadowed by the wintry precipitation.”

As in the past, a watch indicates that the weather being described is possible, and the public should be prepared. With a warning, the dangerous weather is expected, and the weather service said a person hearing the alert should take action.

In its guidance for extreme cold, the weather service suggested dressing in layers, covering all exposed skin, limiting time outdoors and bringing pets indoors.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story