Skip to main content

FDA approves FluMist nasal spray flu vaccine — no doctor required

Gaithersburg, Maryland-based MedImmune has received the Food and Drug Administration’s approval for self- or caregiver-administration of its FluMist nasal spray flu vaccine, meaning no physician needed.

It is expected to be available through online pharmacies beginning next year.

FluMist still needs a prescription and is approved for home administration for individuals 2 to 49 years old. Those administering the vaccine, either to themselves or someone else, must be at least 18 years old, and be required to complete a screening and eligibility assessment. Once approved, the vaccine will be shipped to the address provided with the order.

For children 2 to 17 years old, the FDA said it should be administered by an adult caregiver.

“(This) approval of the first influenza vaccine for self- or caregiver-administration provides a new option for receiving a safe and effective seasonal influenza vaccine potentially with greater convenience, flexibility and accessibility for individuals and families,” said Peter Marks, director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

MedImmune was acquired by AstraZeneca for $15.6 billion in 2007.

FluMist was originally approved as an alternative to traditional influenza vaccine shots in 2003. It is sprayed directly into the nose.

FluMist is a live attenuated influenza vaccine, meaning it contains a weakened version of the flu virus.

Between 2010 and 2023, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that the flu resulted in 9.3 to 41 million illnesses annually, as many as 710,000 hospitalizations and 51,000 deaths annually.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story