Skip to main content

OTC approval for Narcan could be a boon for a Gaithersburg company

Investors ran up stock in Gaithersburg, Maryland-based Emergent BioSolutions Wednesday, after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved opioid overdose treatment Narcan for over-the-counter sales.

While it is unclear how much demand there will be for the nasal spray version of naloxone, and no pricing has been set, Emergent is the maker of Narcan, and demand could be a boon for the company’s revenue.

In December, the FDA gave Emergent fast-track review status for making Narcan widely available to the public without a prescription.



Emergent gained rights to the drug as part of its 2018 acquisition of Adapt Pharma. Since then, it has distributed millions of prescription Narcan devices to national, state and local health departments; first responders, public health clinics, fire departments and police departments.

Emergent’s Narcan is now currently the only naloxone nasal spray approved by the FDA for over-the-counter sales.

The approval of Emergent BioSolutions Narcan requires a change in labeling for currently-approved generic versions of naloxone nasal spray products that rely on Narcan as their reference listed in the drug product.

Generic manufacturers are also required to submit a supplement to their applications to effectively switch their products to OTC status.

All versions of naloxone, including an injectable version, until now have required a prescription, though access laws allow paramedics and other first responders to carry it.

All 50 states have standing orders that also allow pharmacies to dispense the drug without a doctor’s prescription to other authorized individuals.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story