Skip to main content

DC is a ‘job-first’ city for many moving to Washington

WASHINGTON — When it comes to relocating, there are “job-first” movers — those who move to a city primarily for work-related reasons — and “location-first” movers that move because they like the city, and will job search once they get there.

D.C. is definitely a job-first city.

“In the Washington, D.C. area, you have a lot of high-paying jobs for college-educated workers and these are the same workers who might be looking for jobs in New York or Boston or San Francisco, so they may not be committed to moving to D.C. but are instead exploring jobs in a few different places,” Sidney Bennett, at Apartment List told WTOP.

Apartment list surveyed more than 20,000 users to gauge their reasons for moving. Among those moving to Washington, 59 percent said they were moving to Washington because they landed a job here. Only San Jose, California has more job-first movers, at 75 percent.

Those renters moving to Washington also buck a national trend, and actually plan to stay put once they get here.

“Washington has more people planning to settle than a lot of other job-first places, and it may be because there are a lot of jobs that are industry specific that only the Washington area offers, like association-related or government agency jobs,” Bennett said.

The Washington area also has one of the highest concentrations of high-paying professional jobs.
Apartment List’s survey found 36.3 percent of new D.C.-area renters are planning to settle down here long-term.

Nationally, college-educated renters are more likely to be job-first movers.

The metros with the most location-first movers tend to be in more affordable, fast-growing Sunbelt metros, with 69 percent of those moving to Phoenix picking the city, not relocating for a job.

The top city for location-first movers is Las Vegas, with more than eight out of 10 moving to Vegas to look for a job, not because they’ve already landed one.

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story