Skip to main content

DC’s ‘Transit Score’ falls compared to other major cities

Related News

WASHINGTON — Real estate listing firm Redfin’s latest report of Best Cities for Public Transit keeps D.C. at No.4, but the region’s “transit score” fell further than any other major city on the list.

The score comes out every two years, and is based on how convenient a city’s public transportation system is for users.

New York, San Francisco and Boston rank as the top three, unchanged from 2016’s report.

Washington’s “transit score” dropped 2.2 points in 2018. Redfin attributes the change to reduced service by Metrobus and Metrorail. Some bus routes were discontinued and the frequency of trains during rush hour was lowered.

“Once touted as the gold standard for public transit, D.C.’s Metro is now reckoning with decades of deferred maintenance,” said Redfin Washington, D.C. agent John Marcario.

“Tough decisions to reduce service and shut down lines for extended periods for repair are causing short-term frustration.”

Despite the lower score, access to public transportation is still a top priority for D.C. homebuyers, who are willing to pay a premium to live near a Metro station.

Redfin calculates its score by looking at the relative usefulness of public transit routes near a given location, including distance, frequency and type of route.

It is based on data published in the General Transit Feed Specification format by transit agencies across the country.

Seattle and Raleigh, North Carolina posted the greatest improvements compared to their scores in 2016.

Here are the top 10 Best Cities for Public Transit, according to Redfin’s research in 2018:

  • New York
  • San Francisco
  • Boston
  • Washington, D.C.
  • Philadelphia
  • Chicago
  • Seattle
  • Minneapolis
  • Baltimore
  • Honolulu

 

Massachusetts court hears arguments in lawsuit alleging Meta designed apps to be addictive to kids

BOSTON (AP) — Massachusetts' highest court heard oral arguments Friday in the state's lawsuit arguing that Meta designed features on Facebook and Instagram to make them addictive to young users. The lawsuit, filed in 2023 by Attorney General Andrea Campbell, alleges that Meta did this to make a profit and that its actions affected hundreds of thousands of teenagers in Massachusetts who use the social media platforms. “We are making claims based only on the tools that Meta has developed because its own research shows they encourage addiction to the platform in a variety of ways,” said State Solicitor David Kravitz, adding that the state's claim has nothing to do the company's algorithms or failure to moderate content. Meta said Friday that it strongly disagrees with the allegations and is “confident the evidence will show our longstanding commitment to supporting young people.” Its attorney, Mark Mosier, argued in court that the lawsuit “would impose liabilities for performing traditional publishing functions” and that its actions are protected by the First Amendment.
Read Next Story