Skip to main content

Up for track honors, Gatlin shrugs off critics

PAT GRAHAM
AP Sports Writer

Justin Gatlin is far more interested in winning races than popularity contests.

Still, the American sprinter with a doping history doesn’t quite understand the backlash over his nomination for track and field athlete of the year.

Gatlin went undefeated in the 100 and 200 meters this season, a year that didn’t include a major meet and one in which Usain Bolt chose to give his nagging injuries time to heal.

But Gatlin’s inclusion for track’s annual award has angered some athletes. So much so that Olympic discus champion Robert Harting even withdrew from consideration.

Gatlin insisted again and again in an interview with The Associated Press that he’s served his time — four years for testing positive for excessive testosterone in 2006 — and should be at least considered, especially after going 18-0.

His reaction to those showing so much displeasure is this: Why over an award? Why not after he captured a bronze medal at the 2012 London Games or silver at the 2013 world championships?

“Not a peep, then. Not a stir,” Gatlin said. “I don’t make any waves. I don’t say anything bad about anybody. I don’t point fingers.

“I’m sad to say that a lot of people out there feel that, ‘Once a doper, always a doper.’ But that makes no sense. That means you don’t believe your system is working.”

The 32-year-old sprinter said he’s been tested often by U.S. Anti-Doping Agency, World Anti-Doping Agency and IAAF, the governing body of track.

Skepticism remains, though, as when he finished in 9.77 seconds in Brussels last month, a mark achieved only by the world-record holder Bolt, Tyson Gay, Yohan Blake and Asafa Powell. That’s also the time Gatlin was running in 2006, when he tested positive.

“For some reason in an off year, when I run 9.77 with no medal of any sort, and now I get all of this backlash?” Gatlin said. “I guess people feel like if my two feet get me across the line in first, that’s good enough. But they don’t want me to win a popularity contest.”

There was originally a 10-man list of nominees for the award issued by IAAF, until Harting took his name out of the running, with the German telling Spiegel magazine, “It’s insulting for me and my fans.” The winner is announced next month.

“I didn’t ask to get nominated,” Gatlin said. “My choice was to run and win races and be dominant for myself. My job is not to go out and lose. My job is to win. That’s what I’m supposed to do, like everyone else nominated.”

Travis Tygart, the CEO of USADA, believes Gatlin deserves a chance at redemption.

“The rules incorporate the notion of second chances by allowing someone to return after they have served their sanction,” Tygart wrote in an email. “If we don’t like this then let’s change the rules but it’s not fair to move the goal line during the game.”

In the middle year of an Olympic cycle and with no world championships this summer, Gatlin overhauled his training program. He ate healthier and slimmed down to 175 pounds. He also fine-tuned his technique in Florida.

For as fast as he runs, though, his past always catches up. A number of Diamond League meets won’t include him because of his history.

The 2004 Olympic champion tested positive for amphetamines in 2001, but arbitrators decided Gatlin didn’t take it to cheat and that doctors prescribed it to treat attention deficit disorder first diagnosed when he was 9.

“Stopped taking it cold turkey right then, once I tested positive,” said Gatlin, a former star at the University of Tennessee.

Five years later, he tested positive again, this time for testosterone. USADA and the IAAF pushed for an eight-year ban. He served four years.

“I took my lumps, sat my time down, came back and worked hard to make my way back to the top,” he said.

When he returned in 2010, Gatlin was running 10.26. As he lowered his time, he increased his detractors.

That didn’t bother him.

This insinuation, however, did: At the University of Oslo, researchers gave mice testosterone — the same hormone for which Gatlin tested positive — and found the resulting super-mice developed muscle changes and performance benefits that lasted long after doping stopped.

“For the few haters out there, seems like that’s what they want to do, discredit my name and label me with laboratory rats in Oslo, and say, ‘Oh, steroids are in your system for decades and decades,'” Gatlin said. “A lot of athletes that tested positive, they never came back and ran times close to the times they ran when they were positive. I think that proves hard work and dedication on my behalf.

“I’m not doing anything that’s a secret to anybody. I’m just going out there and believing in myself.”

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story