Skip to main content

Attorney: ‘Fatal Vision’ court case will continue

RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — The case of the Green Beret doctor who has maintained for decades that not him but a band of hippies chanting “acid is groovy, kill the pigs” slaughtered his wife and two young daughters will continue in court.

Despite the latest judicial rejection of his claims of innocence and a request for a new trial, his attorney Gordon Widenhouse said Friday, “There’s going to be further litigation.”

Jeffrey MacDonald, 70, is serving a life sentence for the murders of his pregnant wife and two daughters, who were killed Feb. 17, 1970, in the family apartment at Fort Bragg. MacDonald — who was convicted in 1979, released in 1980 and returned to prison in 1982 — has maintained his innocence for the last 44 years.

In a decision based on a hearing held almost two years ago, Judge James C. Fox rejected both MacDonald’s claim of innocence and his appeal. ” … the court finds that MacDonald has not established, by clear and convincing evidence, that no reasonable factfinder would have found him guilty of the murder of his wife and two daughters …” Fox wrote, adding that MacDonald “failed to establish any assumed actual innocence claim.”

At that hearing, MacDonald’s attorneys emphasized that Helena Stoeckley, who testified at MacDonald’s trial, wasn’t involved in the murders and that she didn’t know where she was when Colette, 5-year-old Kimberley and 2-year-old Kristen were killed. Her attorney, Jerry Leonard, testified at the 2012 hearing that Stoeckley, who died in 1983, told him two versions of events: that she wasn’t in the apartment and that she was, but that she didn’t participate in the murders.

“We’re obviously disappointed that Judge Fox denied our requests for relief because we thought we had presented credible evidence that the (trial) jury had not heard, particularly from Helena Stoeckley, which we thought would have made a difference, given the circumstantial evidence the prosecutor presented at that trial,” Widenhouse said.

U.S. Attorney Thomas Walker said in a news release that MacDonald will have to seek permission from the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to appeal Fox’s ruling.

MacDonald’s attorneys also argued that new evidence, including DNA from the apartment that didn’t match MacDonald or his family, supported MacDonald’s claims. They also called witnesses to testify about statements by a retired U.S. marshal, who is now dead, that a prosecutor pressured Stoeckley to lie on the stand.

The statements by the marshal likely “are fabrications or confused memories,” Fox wrote, which made all of them “incredible and unreliable.” The DNA evidence “is far from clear and convincing of MacDonald’s actual innocence,” the judge wrote.

Bob Stevenson, Colette MacDonald’s brother, said Friday that he takes “absolute and total satisfaction” in Fox’s decision. He said he wasn’t surprised that MacDonald plans to keep pursuing the case.

“I know it will never be over until he is dead or I am dead,” Stevenson said.

Kathryn MacDonald said she was disappointed in the ruling regarding her husband, but said the effort to get a new trial will go on.

“It’s a shame. It’s frustrating,” she said. “But we remain undaunted. The truth will prevail.”

The MacDonald family murders brought chills to the community, coming just months after the murders by the Charles Manson followers in California, where “pig” was written in blood on the door of the home where actress Sharon Tate and four others were killed. And like the Manson murders, the MacDonald killings led to books, the famous of which was “Fatal Vision.”

Written by author Joe McGinness, the book — and the television miniseries based on it — concluded MacDonald was guilty. Just before the 2012 hearing for MacDonald, documentary filmmaker Errol Morris’ book, “A Wilderness of Error,” was published. Morris concluded that MacDonald did not get a fair trial and might not be guilty.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story