Skip to main content

Hacking verdicts pile pressure on Cameron, Murdoch

JILL LAWLESS
Associated Press

LONDON (AP) — Britain’s epic tabloid phone-hacking trial ended Wednesday with a hung jury on two final counts — and a judge’s rebuke for Prime Minister David Cameron, whose televised comments about the case while it was still underway almost scuttled proceedings.

Cameron is already under pressure for his ties to the only person convicted at the trial, former News of the World tabloid editor — and ex-Downing Street communications director — Andy Coulson.

Coulson’s conviction for conspiracy to hack phones was also unwelcome news for Rupert Murdoch, his former employer, and raises the possibility of a corporate prosecution for Murdoch’s media behemoth, News Corp.

Senior Murdoch executives have already been questioned by U.K. police investigating wrongdoing at his British tabloids and the Guardian newspaper reported Wednesday that detectives want to question Murdoch “under caution” — meaning as a potential suspect.

Neither the police nor News Corp. would comment on that report.

On Tuesday, a jury at London’s Old Bailey unanimously convicted Coulson of conspiring to hack phones. Rebekah Brooks, the former chief executive of Murdoch’s British newspapers, was acquitted on charges related to phone hacking, bribing officials and obstructing police. Her husband Charlie Brooks and three of her former employees also were cleared.

Media industry analyst Claire Enders said Murdoch and his executives would likely be relieved, even with the mixed verdicts.

“The conviction of Andy Coulson has definitely created the possibility of a corporate prosecution,” Enders said. “But that is a small worry compared to what would have occurred if Rebekah Brooks had been found guilty. The charges of which she was acquitted, in particular perverting the course of justice, would have been difficult to shift from her ultimate boss.”

Judge John Saunders ended the trial on Wednesday — the 139th day of proceedings — after jurors said they could not agree on whether Coulson and ex-News of the World royal editor Clive Goodman were guilty on two counts of paying police officers for royal phone directories. Prosecutors plan to announce Monday whether they will seek a retrial on those charges.

Coulson, who served as Cameron’s communications chief between 2007 and 2011, faces up to two years in jail on the hacking charge. He is due to be sentenced next week, along with five former News of the World staffers who pleaded guilty before the trial began.

The eight-month trial — one of the longest and most expensive criminal cases in British history — was triggered by revelations that the scandal-hungry News of the World had routinely eavesdropped on the voicemails of politicians, celebrities and others in the public eye.

The resulting furor led Murdoch to shut down the 168-year-old newspaper and triggered police investigations in which dozens of journalists, police officers and other officials have been arrested.

The Metropolitan Police says those investigations have cost more than 32 million pounds ($54 million) and identified 5,500 potential hacking victims.

News Corp. has spent more than $500 million on costs related to the scandal, including payments to hundreds of people whose phones were hacked.

The trial of Brooks and Coulson — once powerful insiders with close ties to Cameron and other top political figures — drew intense interest in Britain.

Coulson’s lawyers repeatedly sought to have the case dismissed, arguing that their client could not receive a fair trial given the vast amount of speculation about the case. Their final attempt was spurred by Cameron’s televised apology Tuesday for hiring Coulson in 2007 — after Goodman and private investigator Glenn Mulcaire were briefly jailed for hacking the phones of royal aides.

“It is astonishing, we say unprecedented, for a prime minister to make public comments of such a crucial juncture in trial proceeding,” said Coulson’s lawyer, Timothy Langdale.

The judge did not throw out the case but admonished Cameron, saying it was “unsatisfactory, so far as justice and the rule of law are concerned … when politicians regard it as open season.”

In the House of Commons, Cameron apologized again for his “wrong decision” in hiring Coulson but opposition leader Ed Miliband said an apology was not good enough.

“This is about his character, his judgment and the warnings he ignored,” Miliband said of Cameron. “For four years the prime minister’s hand-picked closest adviser was a criminal and brought disgrace to Downing Street.”

Follow Jill Lawless at http://Twitter.com/JillLawless

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story