Skip to main content

Correction: Political Money story

WASHINGTON (AP) — In a May 20 story about political fundraising, The Associated Press, relying on a summary of fundraising reports provided by a National Republican Senatorial Committee spokesman, erroneously reported how much cash the committee had on hand. The Senate Republicans’ campaign arm had almost $19.3 million saved, not almost $22 million.

A corrected version of the story is below:

Campaign finance reports put voters on notice

Big money raised to turn into never-ending ads, campaign finance reports warn voters

By PHILIP ELLIOTT

Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Political committees and groups offered clues to their influence as campaign finance filings dribbled out Tuesday and nomination fights morphed into an all-out battle for control of the Senate.

Deep-pocketed donors helped the parties’ campaign committees build a cash reserve that easily topped $146 million, according to summaries of Federal Election Commission reports that were to be filed by the end of the day. Separately, their allies were sitting on tens of millions more that were ready to be used for negative television ads, mail and phone calls.

Those millions of dollars – and the tactics they fund – already had inundated voters who were picking nominees on Tuesday in Kentucky, Georgia and elsewhere. Heavy spending was already set to follow in next month’s primaries in Iowa, Mississippi and Colorado and continue all the way through Election Day on Nov. 4.

The incomplete snapshot of money’s power in political races came into focus as parties and outside groups faced Tuesday’s deadline to report how much cash they collected in April. Missing from the picture: groups that only report in three-month increments and groups – such as the Koch brothers-backed Americans for Prosperity or the Karl Rove-endorsed Crossroads GPS – that do not have to disclose their finances because, under campaign finance rules, they are considered nonpartisan and nonprofit.

The figures also miss the hundreds of millions of dollars federal candidates raise for themselves.

And the reports didn’t capture millions spent in Kentucky since May 1 on the hard-fought primary between Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell and his tea party primary challenger Matt Bevin. Nor did they capture more than $500,000 in recent spending to help Republican state lawmaker Chris McDaniel, who is challenging GOP Sen. Thad Cochran’s bid for a seventh term representing Mississippi.

Even so, the finance landscape gave both Democrats and Republicans reasons to be optimistic heading toward November’s elections. Both parties were well funded, although Democrats’ Senate and House campaign committees outraised their GOP rivals and built a clear cash advantage.

Voters, already weary of political ads, are unlikely to get a break.

Democrats’ party-controlled committees reported they had raised $285 million so far this cycle and had more than $76 million banked as of May 1.

The Democratic National Committee reported $8.9 million raised in April and reduced its debt to $8.7 million – a new low this election cycle, down from a high of almost $23 million. The DNC said most of that debt is owed to political vendors, such as advertisers, contractors and consultants.

The DNC had $7.9 million in the bank.

The Democrats’ Senate campaign arm reported raising $6.3 million in April and had $25 million in hand.

And the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee reported it raised $7.1 million in April and banked a staggering $43.4 million. For yet another month, the DCCC posted the largest cash-on-hand number so far among committees and outpaced most super PACs as well.

Outside the party’s official control, the Democratic-backing House Majority PAC also reported $6.2 million on hand after spending $1.1 million in April. The group, however, pulled in just $343,000 last month. Of that, $250,000 came from George Marcus, a Palo Alto, California, real estate developer.

But Republicans were set to counter that with aggressive spending plans – much of it outside the reporting requirements of campaign-finance laws.

Americans for Prosperity, the group backed by billionaire brothers Charles and David Koch, was set to spend $125 million to help Republicans in Senate races. All of it was likely to be outside campaign finance reports.

And Rove’s political machine signaled it was ready to spend almost $15 million on ads in four states with competitive Senate races. But of that sum, about half is for races in Arkansas and Alaska and is funneled through American Crossroads, a super PAC that discloses its donors. The other half was through the nonprofit Crossroads GPS, which booked TV time in North Carolina, Colorado, Arkansas and Alaska.

Inside the GOP’s official committees, the Republican National Committee said it raised $9.3 million in April and had set aside $13.2 million with an eye to the fall. Since January 2013, the RNC has always had more cash on hand than the DNC despite heavy spending on staff and technology.

“We’re frankly killing the DNC in fundraising,” Republican National Committee Treasurer Tony Parker told party leaders earlier this month. “This is in spite of the fact we don’t have the White House or the president stumping all over the country for us”

The same cannot be said for the GOP Senate and House campaign committees.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee raised $6 million in April and ended the month with $19.3 million on hand. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee has outraised the Republican rival 14 of the last 16 months.

The National Republican Congressional Committee said it raised $4.1 million in April and had more than $32 million in the bank to defend their majority during this year’s midterm elections. The NRCC has been outraised by Democrats’ committee in 14 of the last 16 months.

___

Follow Philip Elliott on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/philip_elliott

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story