Skip to main content

Geithner memoir: He made repeated offers to resign

JOSH BOAK
AP Economics Writers

WASHINGTON (AP) — Timothy Geithner says in a new memoir that he repeatedly offered to resign as Treasury secretary in the aftermath of the financial crisis and at one point suggested that Hillary Rodham Clinton be among those considered to replace him.

President Barack Obama rebuffed Geithner’s suggestion, and he remained at Treasury until 2013.

Geithner’s memoir will be published next week. On Thursday, The Associated Press bought an early copy.

Geithner recalls his offers of resignation in “Stress Test,” which explores his turbulent four years at Treasury. During his tenure, the Obama administration confronted the worst recession and most severe financial crisis since the Great Depression.

He portrays his offers to resign as reflecting his uncertainty about whether he was up to the immense challenges of the job. Ultimately, Geithner concludes that the economy stabilized under his watch.

In several sections of his memoir, Geithner writes of internal conversations about who might replace him in a post he had been initially reluctant to accept.

When his nomination ran into challenges over his tax filing problems, Geithner offered to pull his name from consideration. He writes that he later volunteered several times to step down from the Cabinet post if administration officials felt that doing so would boost Obama’s standing at a perilous moment for the economy.

In proposing that the White House consider Clinton as a successor in 2010, Geithner cited her star power as secretary of state. Among the other names Geithner suggested was Jack Lew, who succeeded him last year.

By his own acknowledgement, Geithner seemed an awkward fit as Treasury secretary, neither an economist nor a banker nor a natural public speaker.

He found himself unable to quell what he calls the public’s “Old Testament” outrage at bankers who received federal aid and cashed outsized bonus checks after the financial meltdown that erupted in 2008. At least one of those bankers, JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, offered to help the administration rewrite the regulations overseeing the big banks, Geithner writes. The administration declined Dimon’s offer.

Clinton’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, advised Geithner that publicly criticizing prominent bankers, such as Goldman Sachs’ CEO Lloyd Blankfein, wouldn’t appease ordinary Americans.

“You could take Lloyd Blankfein into a dark alley, and slit his throat, and it would satisfy them for about two days,” Geithner recalled Clinton telling him. “Then the blood lust would rise again.”

Geithner notes that easy money and risky behavior fueled the housing bubble and led to the financial crisis. Deceit and fraud by some financial institutions, he writes, were a component of the mania. But they weren’t its primary cause.

No Treasury secretary since the Depression confronted so many financial threats at once. When Geithner became Treasury secretary in January 2009, the economy had sunk into a deep recession. Unemployment was surging, and the financial system was teetering.

Having previously led the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Geithner had worked to craft the government’s early response to the financial crisis. The crisis erupted in the fall of 2008 with the fall of investment bank Lehman Brothers and the government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac

Geithner’s supporters said he deserved credit for helping steady the banking system, restore investor confidence and avert a complete meltdown.

His critics countered that his policies consistently favored big banks and neglected ordinary Americans, including many struggling to save their homes after a wave of foreclosures followed the housing bust.

In his memoir, Geithner pushes back against such criticism. He writes that it would have been impossible to fix the economy without first shoring up the banking system and restoring confidence. This, he writes, was the most urgent task. A banking panic would have defeated the administration’s efforts to help the economy recover.

He acknowledges that the government’s efforts to help troubled homeowners keep their homes were inadequate. But he argues that no “game-changing housing plan” that would have offered Americans substantial relief existed for Geithner’s team to embrace.

Geithner rejected the idea of fixing banks by nationalizing them or letting the weakest firms fail. Instead, he writes, while vacationing on a beach in Mexico, he fleshed out a plan for using “stress tests” to see how much additional capital banks would need to survive a financial catastrophe.

If banks struggled to pass these tests, they would have to raise capital privately or be forced to accept support from the government. Geithner writes that this strategic choice was key to salvaging the financial system.

In the book, Geithner addresses his biggest public relations disaster — his first speech as Treasury secretary on Feb. 10, 2009.

Obama had told reporters at his first news conference that Geithner would lay out how the administration would fix the financial system.

“He’s going to be terrific,” Obama said of Geithner.

The speech unnerved investors. The Dow Jones industrial average plunged nearly 400 points, an ominous start for an administration official whose main task was to restore confidence in financial markets.

“It’s fair to say the speech did not go well,” Geithner writes.

Yet Geithner said the plan, which involved determining how much capital the biggest banks needed, ended up working.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story