Skip to main content

Exposing the cover-ups, chaos of the Kennedy assassination investigation

WASHINGTON – In 2008, Philip Shenon was at his desk at The New York Times’ Washington bureau when his phone rang. On the other line was a prominent American lawyer with an intriguing request for the investigative journalist.

The man on the other end was a former staffer on the Warren Commission, a committee of congressmen, counsel and staffers tasked by President Lyndon B. Johnson to investigate the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.

“He said there are all these great detective stories to be told about the Warren Commission,” says Shenon, who, at the time had just completed a book on the 9/11 Commission.

Intrigued, Shenon dove right into the subject. Five years of research took him down the rabbit hole of destroyed evidence, cover-ups and mismanagement of information pertaining to Kennedy’s assassination. Shenon recovered these missing pieces from in-depth interviews with surviving commission staffers and key players in the Kennedy investigation.

Shenon recently talked with WTOP about his new book, “A Cruel and Shocking Act: The Secret History of the Kennedy Assassination,” to share his findings and surprising revelations related to what is still one of the most confusing and controversial times in American history.

“In the course of doing this book, in many ways I think I can now … rewrite the history of the assassination,” Shenon says.

The Warren Commission

Just seven days after the Nov. 22, 1963, assassination of Kennedy, Johnson established a commission to investigate the president’s death. Known officially as The President’s Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, the group was more commonly referred to as the Warren Commission after its chairman, Chief Justice Earl Warren.

“It was set up in part because Johnson was so worried about all of the wild conspiracy theories that were beginning to fly around the country, and in fact, around the world,” says Shenon. “Some of these theories focused on Johnson as a suspect in Kennedy’s death, and he wanted somebody of real esteem, like Earl Warren, to run this to put an end to a lot of the rumors.”

However, Warren was less than thrilled about his nomination to the position, and Shenon’s book details how Johnson essentially forced the chief justice into the role.

Shenon says Warren’s unenthused attitude may have added to a rushed investigation and the concluding “single-bullet theory.”

“He decided in his mind very quickly that (Lee Harvey) Oswald acted alone, there was no conspiracy and he really does his darndest to get this investigation over with as quickly as possible. And I think the records show the investigation was rushed, and a lot of questions were just never answered,” Shenon says.

Warren’s staffers who made up the investigative committee were, as Shenon describes, young, hot-shot lawyers. When they came to Washington, many of them believed in a conspiracy surrounding the assassination and were eager to find it. However, they had very little experience with government relations and the inner workings of government agencies.

“I just don’t think they knew what they were up against in agencies like the CIA and the FBI that were able to hide so much information from the investigation,” Shenon says.

Shenon’s research discovered the staff on the commission came close to rebellion over the way Warren handled the investigation — especially when he refused to allow the commission to see documents vital to the investigation, such as Kennedy’s autopsy photos and X-rays.

When the commission released its final report on Sept. 24, 1964, Shenon reports it was censored to remove information regarding Oswald and other informative pieces of related information. The way the commission handled the investigation, and the final report, caused a crowd of skeptics, including Robert Kennedy, who never believed the Warren Commission uncovered the truth of JFK’s death.

Disappearing evidence

When it comes to the Kennedy assassination, Shenon says the real mystery is the investigation, itself.

“I think the most shocking thing is how much very basic evidence about the assassination and about Lee Harvey Oswald was destroyed or disappeared,” Shenon says.

Kennedy’s assassination occurred on a Friday, and in just the course of the weekend, Shenon says so much key evidence went missing.

He explains on Saturday night, the Navy pathologist who performed the autopsy on Kennedy pushed the original autopsy draft report and all of his notes from the autopsy room into his home fireplace because they were “stained with the president’s blood.”

The doctor later revealed that he mishandled Kennedy’s medical information during the investigation.

Government cover-ups

While Kennedy’s autopsy took place in Bethesda, Md., additional pieces of evidence in the assassination were ruined several states away.

“That same weekend, you had FBI agents in Dallas rip up a handwritten note that Lee Harvey Oswald had left for them in the Dallas field office a couple of weeks earlier, and flushed that note’s scraps down the toilet. So we’ll never know exactly what it was that Oswald was trying to communicate to the FBI, you know, just three weeks before the president is murdered,” Shenon says.

But to Shenon, the most shocking — and biggest missing piece — of information in the assassination investigation is a trip Oswald took to Mexico City.

“I think most Americans do not associate Mexico City with the Kennedy assassination,” Shenon says.

Just seven weeks before Kennedy’s assassination, Oswald spent nearly six days in Mexico City, where, Shenon explains, he came in contact with Cuban spies, Russian spies and Mexicans sympathetic to Fidel Castro.

“Some of these people may have wanted to see President Kennedy dead, and the question was, did Oswald tell any of these people what he was going to do? And was he encouraged to do what he was going to do?”

According to Shenon, all of Oswald’s time in Mexico City went almost entirely uninvestigated by the CIA and the FBI after the assassination.

“It would show just how much the CIA and the FBI really had no idea about Oswald and the threat that he posed.”

Shenon’s conclusions shed light on inconclusion

When it comes to drawing conclusions about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, Shenon says the way the government handled the investigation may never give us a conclusion. He says government officials and agencies are to blame for all of the circulating conspiracy theories “that are likely to plague us forever.”

Most notably, Shenon says officials in the U.S. government, especially the CIA, lied about the assassination and events leading up to Nov. 22, 1963.

Follow @WTOP and @WTOPliving on Twitter.

Don’t Settle for Student Loans to Pay for Online Education

Online college programs are becoming a more popular choice for prospective students, with one study finding that more than 6 million students enrolled in at least one online course in fall 2015. The popularity of these courses can be attributed in part to their flexibility with working adults' schedules, students' ability to progress more quickly through online programs and, oftentimes, cheaper tuition. [See 10 low-cost online bachelor's programs for out-of-state students.]Online degrees can be beneficial to many college students, but some studies have shown online learners complete their programs at lower rates than students at traditional brick-and-mortar campuses. Individuals with student loans but no degree comprise two-thirds of defaulted borrowers. Though these numbers are not encouraging, just like for traditional programs, there are ways to reduce how much you'll need to borrow for an online program to ensure you won't become one of these statistics. Don't just settle on borrowing student loans to cover the whole cost of your program and living expenses. Instead, start thinking about how to cut costs and cover your balance in different ways, such as the following. -- Grants and scholarships: Even though you are taking an online course, you can still apply and receive grants and scholarships. But your first step should be to complete the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, commonly referred to as the FAFSA, which will allow you to receive a Pell Grant if your expected family contribution is low enough. The EFC criteria and award amounts are adjusted annually, but the 2017-2018 academic year awards range from $606 to $5,920, which could significantly lower the amount you borrow annually. Your next step is to apply for scholarships. You can start by checking online scholarship search engines, such as the Salt Scholarship Search, College Board's BigFuture and Peterson's. But don't forget to take advantage of local organizations and your school's financial aid office. Both may offer scholarships that you can't find with a national scholarship search. [Review these 10 sites to kick off your scholarship search.]For instance, organizations like the Elks Club, Knights of Columbus or the Rotary Club typically offer scholarships annually to local students. Just because you're going to school online doesn't mean you're ineligible. Visit your local library for scholarship listings, and ask around town. You might be surprised how many local organizations offer scholarships. While these scholarships typically aren't large, every little bit counts. Each dollar you receive in a scholarship is a dollar you don't have to borrow and pay interest on. -- Work-study: Another option for online students may be work-study awards. Not all students enrolled in online programs are eligible, but students at some schools -- including, for example, SUNY Empire State College and Liberty University -- are. Work-study awards are not given upfront like scholarships and grants. In most cases, they are an offer to earn up to the awarded amount if you secure an eligible work-study job. While there is a misconception that all work-study jobs must be on campus, students can work for off-campus, nonprofit or public employers as long as the work is in the public's interest. You may be able to work for a for-profit employer if the job is relevant to your course of study. No matter who the outside employer is, it will need to have an established agreement with your college for you to receive work-study funds. Remember, to be eligible for federal financial aid, you must be enrolled and pursuing a degree or certificate. If you're not working toward a credential, Pell Grants and work-study won't be option, but you may still be able to take advantage of private scholarships -- just be sure to read the eligibility criteria carefully. [Explore what to know about financial aid in online programs.]-- Pay as you go: One of the great benefits to enrolling online is the flexible schedule, which can allow you to complete your college coursework around your responsibilities. But prospective students often overlook using their part- or full-time job earnings as an option for paying for college. Almost 80 percent of college students in 2015 worked at least part time while attending classes, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. By budgeting and thinking strategically about your college costs, you can likely reduce your dependence on student loans by paying a portion out of pocket. Many -- but not all -- online programs are less expensive than traditional programs and often have shorter payment periods. Six, eight or 10 weeks are common course durations. Because of the frequency of payments in an online setting, you may be well-placed to pay as you go and possibly avoid borrowing altogether. Attending college online and avoiding student loans may be challenging, but if you are willing to put in the effort, you can limit the amount you need to borrow. More from U.S. News Q&A: Understanding Student Loan Discharge Eligibility Student Loan Refinancing Isn't Right for All Borrowers
Read Next Story